|
Where the international application, on the date on which one or more elements referred to in Article 11(1)(iii) were first received by the receiving Office, claims the priority of an earlier application, the request may contain a statement that, where an element of the international application referred to in Article 11(1)(iii)(d) or (e) or a part of the description, claims or drawings referred to in Rule 20.5(a) is not otherwise contained in the international application but is completely contained in the earlier application, that element or part is, subject to confirmation under Rule 20.6, incorporated by reference in the international application for the purposes of Rule 20.6. Such a statement, if not contained in the request on that date, may be added to the request if, and only if, it was otherwise contained in, or submitted with, the international application on that date. | |
|
|
|
The request shall contain no matter other than that specified in Rules 4.1 to 4.18, provided that the Administrative Instructions may permit, but cannot make mandatory, the inclusion in the request of any additional matter specified in the Administrative Instructions. | |
|
|
|
If the request contains matter other than that specified in Rules 4.1 to 4.18 or permitted under paragraph (a) by the Administrative Instructions, the receiving Office shall ex officio delete the additional matter. | |
|
1 |
Editor's Note: This information is also published on the WIPO website at: www.wipo.int/pct/en/texts/reservations/res_incomp.pdf. |
|
2 |
Editor's Note: Paragraphs (a) and (b) of Rule 4.10 as amended with effect from January 1, 2000, and paragraph (a) of the said Rule as amended again with effect from April 1, 2007, shall not apply in respect of any designated Office which has informed the International Bureau of incompatibility with the national law applied by that Office, as provided by paragraph (d) of that Rule. Paragraphs (a) and (b) as in force until December 31, 1999, continue to apply after that date in respect of any such designated Office for as long as those paragraphs as amended continue not to be compatible with the applicable national law. Information received by the International Bureau concerning any such incompatibility is published in the Gazette and on the WIPO website at: www.wipo.int/pct/en/texts/reservations/res_incomp.pdf. The text of paragraphs (a) and (b) as in force until December 31, 1999, is reproduced below: | |
|
|
|
Any declaration referred to in Article 8(1) ("priority claim") shall, subject to Rule 26bis.1, be made in the request; it shall consist of a statement to the effect that the priority of an earlier application is claimed and shall indicate: | |
|
|
|
the date on which the earlier application was filed, being a date falling within the period of 12 months preceding the international filing date; | |
|
|
|
the number of the earlier application; | |
|
|
|
where the earlier application is a national application, the country party to the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property in which it was filed; | |
|
|
|
where the earlier application is a regional application, the authority entrusted with the granting of regional patents under the applicable regional patent treaty; | |
|
|
|
where the earlier application is an international application, the receiving Office with which it was filed. | |
|
|
|
In addition to any indication required under paragraph (a)(iv) or (v): | |
|
|
|
where the earlier application is a regional application or an international application, the priority claim may indicate one or more countries party to the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property for which that earlier application was filed; | |
|
|
|
where the earlier application is a regional application and the countries party to the regional patent treaty are not all party to the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property, the priority claim shall indicate at least one country party to that Convention for which that earlier application was filed." | |
|
|